Supply and Demand of Domestic Corneal Tissue and Its Implications on Export Potential-Using Australia as an Example.

PURPOSE: Corneal tissue importation is only possible if another country is able to export corneas without impacting its own domestic demand. Currently, there is little evidence to indicate whether export nations have such surplus capacity and in a position to export. To explore this concept, we examined our nation, Australia, which is reported to routinely decline donations because of its ability to meet domestic corneal transplant demand. Our research offers insights and opportunities for Australia and other nations to evaluate their domestic and international supply and allocation of corneal tissue in this space. METHOD: We collated 12 months of data on collected and noncollected donations, through participating Australian Eye Banks. The explanation of why some known donors were declined or not pursued indicated if demand was met and potential surplus-for-export levels. RESULTS: There were 7.5% (n = 11,889) of deaths in Australia that were notified to Australian Eye Banks during our reporting period. Of those, 9.3% (n = 1106/11,889) were recovered and allocated, 15.7% (n = 1863/11,889) were known but declined, and 75% (n = 8920/11,889) were not pursued. Of those that were declined, 64.3% (n = 1197/1863) were declined because of limitations with service/manpower at the eye bank, whereas 35.7% (n = 666/1863) were declined because demand was met. CONCLUSIONS: Australia did not meet demand all the time, during our data period. There were adequate quantities of potential donors to support increasing recovery for domestic allocation and provide for exportation without hindrance to Australian demand. Further examination of domestic supply and demand cycles and the export process is required before routine exportation.

Donation of discarded ocular tissue in patients undergoing SMILE laser refractive surgery: developing appropriate guidelines.

Tissue Biobanks represent an invaluable resource. Despite the majority of people supporting tissue donation, the actual rate remains low overall. Tissue discarded from surgical procedures represents a further avenue for collection for use in research. We aim to understand the information and consent requirements in a cohort of healthy, post-ophthalmic surgical subjects to optimise future tissue collection in living donors. Patients attending an ophthalmic clinic following refractive surgery for myopia (SMILE) were identified. Patient consent was implied with the completion of the provided survey. The questionnaire included gender, age range and education status. The majority of 31 subjects identified a benefit for future patients as the main motive for potential donation of discarded tissue (71%). Payment for the discarded tissue would not influence their decision in 77.4%. Explanation of the potential benefits of research was the most important information to consider before making a decision to donate. Only 12.9% of patients would have refused to include further information. Almost half of patients felt that the Biobank became the owner of tissue following donation. Current surgical patients may be more inclined to participate in research than the general public because of a sense of duty or an increased understanding of the role of research in evolving treatment. Despite minor uncertainty about the eventual use of the tissue and data, most subjects were positive to donation of discarded ocular tissue and de-identified information. Consent and education processes should be revised within an ophthalmic practice to minimise future patient anxiety.